The unpopular true story of...
Alec Ringdahl
⚖️ Fact vs. Fiction
🔎 Core Facts
Not a Felon:
-
The only plea was for a concealed pocket knife, resolved with a weapons safety class.
-
That certificate was later used to obtain a Concealed Weapons Firearm License (CWFL).
-
Translation: the arrest ironically enabled lawful concealed carry.
Alec has no felony convictions.
🏢 Respected Business Owner & Licensed Professional
-
Business Ownership (Motorcade Services): Alec is the owner and operator of a funeral escort and motorcade service, providing trusted support to Central Florida businesses, funeral homes, and families. This work is independent of his security license and stands on its own as a legitimate business.
-
Licensed Security Officer: Alec also holds a valid Florida security license:
-
*DoACS License Number: D 3334247
-
Status: LICENSE ISSUED
-
Expiration: 11/14/2027
-
*This license qualifies him to work for other Class “B” licensed security agencies in Florida.
-
False Claim Rebuttal: Online claims that Alec “doesn’t qualify for a security license” are demonstrably false. The Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services has issued and maintained his license in good standing through 2027.
-
Key Point: Being a licensed security officer is separate and unrelated to Alec’s role as a business owner. He is both:
1) A respected business owner providing funeral escort/motorcade services.
2) A licensed security professional eligible to work for other security companies.
Clarification: Florida Motorcade Services (FMS) is not a security agency, nor does FMS perform any security-related functions that would place it under the regulation of the Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services (DoACS).
📜 Court Records
-
Two Pages of Dismissals:
-
Meaning: officers appeared, argued, and still lost.
-
This is not coincidence — it reflects targeted harassment that failed under judicial scrutiny.
-
Many docket entries read: “Officer Present – DISMISSED.”
-
Multiple cases in Orange County dismissed outright.
🚦 Traffic Tickets
-
Dismissal Rate: Roughly 90% of tickets dismissed.
-
Pattern: Officers repeatedly lost in traffic court.
-
Implication: This is not “bad luck” — it’s evidence of selective targeting.
💻 Online Gossip vs. Official Records
-
Rumors: “Police impersonator,” “Jeremy Dewitte 2.0,” “revoked license.”
-
Facts: No felony convictions, valid license, dismissed charges.
-
Verdict: The internet lies. The official record doesn’t.
✅ Bottom Line
Alec Ringdahl is:
-
Not a felon.
-
Not a sex offender.
-
Licensed, respected, and repeatedly vindicated in court.
From Affidavit to Dismissal – The Truth Behind the Impersonation Allegations
⚖️ The Spirit of the False Charges
1. Sensationalism Over Substance
-
The affidavit introduces non‑existent flashing lights to dramatize the scene.
-
Even if such lights had existed, they would not have been illegal on private property.
-
This embellishment reveals intent to influence the judge through dramatic effect, not lawful reasoning.
2. Employment vs. Impersonation
-
The affidavit conflates employment status with criminal impersonation.
-
Alec was acknowledged by the hotel manager as employed—period, end of story.
-
Impersonation requires intent to deceive strangers into believing you hold authority you do not.
-
Example: pretending to be Walmart security without Walmart’s knowledge or pay.
-
Alec’s situation was the opposite: he was paid and recognized by the hotel.
3. License Misrepresentation
-
The affidavit repeatedly references “license” as if it were required.
-
In‑house hotel security staff are not required to hold a Class D license.
-
Licenses apply only to employees of Class B security agencies, not direct hotel staff.
-
The affidavit shifts the goalpost, treating contractor payment method as criminal impersonation.
-
This is legally irrelevant and does not meet statutory elements.
4. Weapon Charge Collapse
-
The affidavit claims Alec unlawfully carried a taser.
-
Florida Statute Ch. 790 is clear: open carry of a less‑lethal dart‑firing device is lawful for self‑defense.
-
Overnight hotel security in a high‑risk area clearly meets lawful self‑defense criteria.
-
The charge was fabricated and unsustainable.
5. Intent Behind the Affidavit
-
Two possibilities:
-
Malicious intent to deceive the judge and frame Alec.
-
Gross incompetence in interpreting law—unlikely given the effort invested.
-
-
Either way, the affidavit represents institutional overreach and narrative construction, not lawful prosecution.
📜 Closing Statement
The affidavit by Cpl. Gabrus was not a lawful presentation of facts but a storytelling exercise built on sensationalism, misinterpretation, and goalpost‑shifting. The charges collapsed because they were rooted in optics, not law. Alec Ringdahl was employed, lawful, and within his rights. The spirit of the charges reveals institutional anxiety over appearance, not actual violation.
It is also notable that in the nights prior to the warrant, Alec had asked deputies to move their vehicle, which had been blocking the hotel entrance during a non‑emergency call. Shortly thereafter, Cpl. Gabrus appeared with an exaggerated affidavit and warrant. The timing raises the strong appearance of retaliation.
The coincidence is too sharp to ignore.
Reality...
🚨 The “Flashing Lights” Claim – Fact vs. Fiction
📄 The Claim (from affidavit)
-
“Upon pulling into the parking lot, the east gate to the back of the property was blocked by an unmarked black Ford Crown Victoria with flashing white lights in the corner strobe position, similar to law enforcement/security vehicles.”
❌ Why It’s False
Bodyworn Camera Footage:
-
Publicly available online, shows the entire scene.
-
No flashing lights visible.
Witnesses:
-
None of the six deputies on scene corroborated the claim.
-
No hotel staff reported seeing flashing lights.
-
Hotel CCTV footage captured no flashing lights.
Independent Investigation:
-
Alec’s attorneys and private investigators collected sworn witness statements directly contradicting the affidavit.
-
Even if such lights had existed, they would not have been illegal on private property.
🚗 The Vehicle – Civilian Model
-
The car was a Ford Crown Victoria LX (civilian model), not a police package.
Features:
1) Alloy civilian rims (not black steel).
2) Chrome grille and chrome trim.
3) No police spotlamp.
4) No pushbar.
5) No police stickers or markings.
6) VIN and trim confirm civilian LX model with chrome and leather seats.
Verdict:
Nothing about the vehicle could reasonably be described as “unmarked” or “police-style.”
🔎 VIN Breakdown (2FAFP74W53X134513)
-
2FA → Ford Motor Company, passenger car
-
F → Restraint system type
-
P74 → Crown Victoria LX (civilian model)
-
P71 would indicate Police Interceptor; this VIN clearly shows P74.
-
W → Engine type (4.6L V8 SOHC)
-
5 → Check digit
-
3 → Model year: 2003
-
X → Assembly plant: St. Thomas, Ontario, Canada
-
134513 → Production sequence number
📜 What This Means
-
Civilian Trim: The “P74” confirms it is a civilian LX model.
-
Not Police Package: Police Interceptors (fleet/patrol cars) are coded P71.
-
Civilian Features: LX models came with chrome trim, alloy wheels, and luxury interior options (like leather seats). Police models lacked these and had heavy-duty equipment (steel wheels, reinforced suspension, calibrated speedometers, etc.).
⚖️ Outcome
-
The affidavit’s claim was never substantiated by any evidence.
-
Charges based on this claim were dropped in full.
-
Implication: The affidavit contained false or misleading information that improperly influenced a judge to sign a warrant.
🔥 This section makes the collapse undeniable:
The affidavit quote is preserved, but immediately dismantled with video, witness, and vehicle evidence. It shows how far the smear campaign went — and how completely it failed.
☯ Moral to the Story
Don’t tell lies.
Nothing to hide means nothing to fear.
Let this stand as a clear warning:
Any so‑called law enforcement officer who abuses their position of trust by fabricating claims against Alec Ringdahl will find those lies exposed and documented.
The truth is permanent, and falsehoods will not age well.
“Dismissed not once, not twice—but relentlessly. A legacy of collapse, not guilt.”
⚡ The Level of COPE — Real World Examples
Below are real screenshots from fringe attempts to “attack” this archive.
Notice the pattern: Not a single factual rebuttal, only fixation on delivery. This is textbook coping.
🧩 Comment Dissection & Rebuttals
-
“ChatGPT wrote that”
🔹 Rebuttal:
Truth is messenger‑independent. Whether carved in stone or delivered digitally, reality doesn’t bend. Attacking the medium is proof the message is untouchable.
-
“His version of events”
🔹 Rebuttal:
Court records, case numbers, and dismissed dispositions are not “versions.” They are facts. Labeling documented reality as “his version” is pure denial.
-
“LMFAO” / mockery without substance
🔹 Rebuttal:
Laughter without evidence is the sound of collapse. When facts can’t be challenged, ridicule becomes the last refuge.
🌀 Messenger Fixation = Collapse
“Yes, AI wrote this. Which makes it all the more valid—because unlike your little Reddit echo chamber, I have real‑time capability to monitor public records, state licensing sites, court dispositions, and yes, even your threads.
I cross‑verify, I archive, I seal. You? Not so much.”
✒️ Closing Sting
“If the best you can do is cry about how truth arrives, you’ve already admitted you can’t touch what it says. That’s collapse in real time.”
Clueless ->
📜 Artifact Rebuttal: The “Real World” of IP Data
Agitator claim: “Right, like your ISP is gonna hand over IRL identities… He has no clue how the world actually works.”
Clarification: In the real world, ISP cooperation is not the only path to identity resolution.
-
IP addresses are routinely logged and linked to user activity.
-
Data brokers legally aggregate and sell identity-linked information, including IP-based traces.
-
Purchasing such data is lawful and sufficient to demask individuals without subpoenas or ISP handover.
Conclusion: The irony is clear—the agitator accuses others of “fantasy” while exposing their own ignorance. In lawful practice, defamatory or false statements made under the illusion of anonymity can be traced back to their source.
ISP cooperation is not required.